sunny 2007-1-11 10:08 AM
Firms Walk Fine Line With 'High-Potential' Programs
A few years ago, IBM's system for grooming future executives had a bug. The computer industry giant found that at times, people nominated into its "executive resources" program were languishing there for more than five years without landing promotions. {gTGY4R
inw#tx^"Qa0k
So last year, Big Blue put a limit on the leadership development program, which involves training and career consultation. Only those individuals deemed likely to move into the executive ranks within 18 months are now eligible, says Karen Calo, IBM's vice president of global talent.
:A2Svl QE
m2f!}7F}
Calo says some feelings may have been bruised when individuals were removed from the program. But IBM is working on another effort to focus attention and resources on a broader swath of the company's standout performers.M7a1BE/jrg6f;H
"T)aao@D8mf
"These are really good people we don't want to lose," Calo says.AY%^ z;K*o
St,S.`6b^6Y2f
The evolution of IBM's programs for rising stars illustrates a broader trend in leadership development. Efforts to identify and nurture "high potential" leaders can go awry, analysts say, in part because organizations can put that label on too many employees or miss good ones. At the same time, giving lots of corporate love to "high-pos" can turn off high performers not included in the programs and cause them to seek work elsewhere.
3Ic"]JL)]6x
N*~eZ0i5O*D:|"j
Striking the right balance when it comes to recognizing potential executives may be hard, but it's vital, says leadership consultant Cara Capretta Raymond. Shrinking tenure among chief executives and a likely mass exodus of leaders in the near future mean companies should start to groom individuals ages 30 and younger for the CEO slot, says Capretta Raymond, vice president of strategy and intellectual property at Korn/Ferry International's leadership development solutions unit.
2@5k#^-}(TG
;K4V7R/BR [
"Who are your next CEOs?" Capretta Raymond asked in a presentation earlier this year. "About 50 percent of our top leaders are going to retire in the next five years."
@w+x&Wn2q3GT,\
}LXw%Ujj
Mixed OutcomesYL"U}#gA D
High-potential leader programs can take a variety of shapes, and often include mentoring, competency development and rotating stints in a company's key divisions. Such programs have grown in popularity over the past dozen years or so at Fortune 500 companies, says Jeff Cohn, managing partner at consulting firm Bench Strength Advisors. Factors behind their rise, he says, include companies' desire to rely less on external hires, which often fail to fit in, and a growing body of research showing that leadership development can boost the bottom line. tr H:y|
(s#Q|m*v)V2P
The results of high-potential leader programs have been mixed, Cohn says. "Some did it right," he says, "and a lot of them did it wrong."
%I W7lcJ#[ Qu
d upq:P
Cohn says companies can commit sins of omission and commission with high-po programs. It's easy to leave out promising individuals because organizations often lack consistent ways of assessing leadership talent, he says. At the same time, Cohn says, if companies are tagging 10 percent or more of their managers as high-potential leaders, they are almost certainly wasting resources. "Once the percentage gets too high, you lose focus and squander capital," he says. Capretta Raymond suggests narrowing high-potential programs down to 2 percent to 3 percent of rising stars. $W#J@Uh*}4b h
L
%N9BRB aCg1U!e
IBM's recent move is along these lines. The 330,000-employee company, which has about 5,000 leaders with titles of director and above, has relied on executives to nominate people into its executive resources program. But it became clear that sometimes solid performers were nominated as a reward rather than because of their legitimate near-term potential to become IBM executives, Calo says. The new 18-month rule is meant to help the executives make better choices. "This isn't a science," she says. "It's a bit of an art."i6S;m)R&E