Too many companies fall into the trap of using a "by default" sourcing strategy as their primary means to find top people.
( o3 a7 c; \- \1 Z3 O/ w0 _
"By default" implies that a company follows someone else's best practices, uses boring job descriptions as their primary means to find people, looks for people only after a req has been approved, uses antiquated technology to manage their data, and uses a one-size-fits-all transactional advertising model.
3 a; U# G w V* w0 CIn this article I'm going to make the case that the creation and implementation of a comprehensive sourcing strategy will be required in order to meet the enormous hiring challenges companies will face in the future.
. a/ _# K+ r. S" @With the demand for talent rapidly outstripping the supply, the ability to fill critical positions quickly with top talent will become a competitive advantage. There will be winners and losers. The losers will be those who follow the winners' best practices, because once the masses discover a practice is discovered to work, it won't anymore.
& `3 P* u# Z5 v( K0 ] \) s" ^4 ~% T
Here are some fundamental themes you need to consider as you develop a comprehensive and proactive sourcing strategy:
. v& ~! s9 L3 z9 R$ Z/ k3 t- Lead, don't follow. Be first. Everything you try won't work, but if you wait to find out, it will be too late.
- Find jobs for people, not people for jobs. This is a fundamental shift starting to gain momentum. The key here is to build a pool of top prospects who are interested in working for your company. Then design a job to meet the needs of the best prospects in your pool.
With this in mind, here are my 10 pillars of an effective sourcing strategy:
$ Y3 b6 M8 v+ q7 d
- Strategic. All of your sourcing programs must tie to your company's business strategy and operating plan. Base it on a comprehensive forward-looking workforce plan. Once you have all of your key positions identified, rank them in order of importance based on their impact on the company's performance. For example, senior executives and product-development gurus require a top 1% to 2% person, whereas a top 20% person might suffice for a mid-level manager in a support function. Always target a top-third as the minimum criteria, even for entry-level positions.
- Sizzling. In order to capture the attention of top people who are "just looking," redesign your processes and messages based on the latest consumer marketing ideas and technology. Design everything with the idea of creating a "wow!" experience. Use compelling jobs, interactive talent hubs, easy-to-use career sites filled with widgets tapped into social and business networks, and opportunities to engage with real people before applying. Let people explore your career opportunities in multiple ways; don't force them to hunt and peck for a specific and boring job.
- Segmented. What works for a highly networked millennial won't for a mid-career boomer. This means everything you do to attract prospects, from how your career site is designed to how jobs are found and described, must be based on the unique job-hunting and career needs of the people you're trying to hire. The workforce plan can help you out here by classifying all of your open jobs into generational and functional buckets. Start building talent hubs for the biggest groups designed to meet their unique needs. Then, develop multi-faceted marketing campaigns to drive traffic to these sites. Once a prospect is engaged with your company through this talent hub, you can then either present specific openings or develop an ongoing relationship.
- SEO'd. Your talent hubs and jobs openings must be found, and that's where search engine optimization techniques come into play. Design everything you do with the idea that people who don't know your company will be able to find your opportunities by using basic search tools like Google, Yahoo!, and Live. The best people don't use the major boards to find jobs, so you'll need to make sure they can be found using traditional search technology. A good talent hub can be designed from the ground up with the idea that the structure, the links, the URL, the meta tags, the content, and the keywords are those your targeted market would use to find your openings.
- Sequential. While you don't want to compromise candidate quality or time to fill, there's no reason to pay more than necessary. This is where a multi-channel sourcing strategy comes into play, from low cost to high cost. A free ad on TheLadders.com or a $200 ad on Dice or Jobing.com that is scraped by an aggregator like Indeed.com that comes up first on a Google search for "auditor jobs Chicago" is a pretty effective channel. Of course, the ad must have enough sizzle to compel the candidate to read it and then apply. This is only the first of many channels. For example, when a great ad is combined with a proactive employee referral program and a strong internal mobility program, you should be able to quickly find a short list of potential candidates. If this doesn't produce the results needed, add higher-cost channels into the mix that target more passive candidates. The idea here is to have a series of highly effective channels to use when needed based on cost. This will allow a company to maximize performance while minimizing cost.
- Substantive. Sourcing without substance is akin to selling smoke and mirrors. You must have real jobs that offer real challenges and real opportunities for growth. That's why a highly effective internal mobility program is of such importance. Demonstrating how this works to a potential candidate is a great way to prove that your company offers real careers. This will help attract, hire, and retain your top performers. Executive buy-in and support is an essential component of a well-developed comprehensive sourcing strategy.
- Systematic. Sourcing needs to be a well-develop business process with metrics. It's comparable to a marketing and sales plan broken out by territory, customer, product, and sales rep. For too many companies, sourcing is a random series of reactive start-stop campaigns that have not been measured, tracked, or validated. The lack of a systematic measured process is why so many companies have a "by default" strategy in place.