Why Your Recruiters Can't Avoid Them) @7 A- v% o; K* [
Video resumes can be anywhere, which is why your recruiters and hiring managers simply can't avoid them.
, D2 M) m, b2 n+ c7 S+ m
- e: n) b/ q7 a% F. Z: f- b {Video resumes can pop up on YouTube or any number of sites like The Vault, Resume Movie, TalkingCV, personal websites, or even Jobster, which was recently one of the first major career sites to allow video resumes within profiles. : \1 _+ Q7 j l* a- v5 b
5 h3 X2 Y1 \: e" C) K4 i; X
Unless you keep your recruiters off the Internet altogether, which would be foolish given the number of great candidates out there and the fact that some recruiting inevitably happens on home computers, you really can't keep them from seeing video resumes.( O% K& h @9 |8 ?
3 B x7 r1 l+ G# s/ T$ o
So your range of options for regulating this phenomenon are:2 Q( n! V' L. l) L
+ v1 L- I- m4 L( q3 H) m$ x: p6 CDiscourage people from sending video resumes. But candidates are famous for taking whatever advice you give them and doing the exact opposite in large numbers. # O, h$ G. [2 ~9 m
Don't accept video resumes. You can write whatever policy you like on this, but someone, somewhere is still going to receive a video resume. I'm not a rule breaker, but if I got one I'd look at it. Curiosity is a powerful thing.
" x: P6 v! }) f! C! W5 `2 i* a7 O1 x0 t7 I
Tell your recruiters to close their eyes. You might even give them a video resume blindfold that they can put on anytime they accidentally click on a link.
6 h+ g! W- `+ A9 q2 }" m7 |All of these policies are clearly unenforceable. The underlying fear here is that people in your company will discriminate against someone because of race, age, gender, and any number of other, more superficial factors not related to this person's ability to do the job.
) ~+ V- m# X$ `9 W9 x9 n5 l, n* Y7 R7 c% c) z
Well, there are plenty of other opportunities to do this, like job fairs, networking events, chance encounters with candidates, blind dates, and of course interviews just to name a few. You might as well outlaw recruiting if your goal is to eliminate all places where a subjective and discriminatory judgment could be made.
% m* W$ b; g1 u
! O0 u/ I5 d( _! qWhy the EEOC and OFCCP Can't Regulate Them( w) K f( z5 u+ x6 d: {
Any time a new technology comes out, you can bet dollars to doughnuts that someone in the recruiting industry will immediately start asking about how this will be viewed by the EEOC or OFCCP.
* |3 h4 L( j- z% d; O7 f$ M
3 s# a' @: c7 m s3 fI know that risk avoidance and mitigation are necessary parts of our business, but come on, people. I'm not saying we shouldn't look before we leap, but let's not let it get in the way of figuring out how a new technology can add value in our recruiting process and to our constituents.
1 j7 ?( Q# M' S% k) | s
s* M% {" {8 k p8 ]+ MI would argue that video resumes simply can't be regulated by the EEOC or OFCCP. It would be rather foolish for them to try. Any attempts at regulations are also likely a long way away. Keep in mind that these are the organizations that took 12 years to define an Internet applicant.
; T Q& c3 C! U3 M7 ~3 `: v
% R. ?6 ]8 \, {: L0 t" }The OFCCP's much-publicized recent guidance in the Internet-applicant arena sent companies scurrying to figure out how they start tracking every single search their recruiters perform. This is close to impossible given the number of sources a recruiter may search, from their own applicant tracking system to Google, Windows Live, or Yahoo!, at home in their pajamas late at night while watching The Matrix trilogy. 6 ?! X& G z3 k' ?0 b
/ } j! G4 p( W" sI can only imagine their guidance on the definition of a video-resume applicant. Any link to that video must be captured in the applicant-tracking system; a transcript of what the individual said must be documented along with their gender, ethnicity, race, and clothing preferences; and all websites with videos that recruiters visit (at home or at work) must be retrievable at any given time.
. R+ ]2 s* [8 [6 k7 w0 T& y3 M- D- e) o/ @* ~, Y
Whether you like it or not, a candidate might one day (if they haven't already) use a video resume in a lawsuit against your company. They could argue that, because their video resume is out on the open Web, your recruiters might have seen it and their appearance, gender, ethnicity, etc. is why they didn't get interviewed or offered the job. It would be quite hard to prove that your recruiters never saw it.
: @/ o+ w) ]; N6 a
v) { j$ l6 s: u4 ^2 vPerhaps there's some good that can come out of this. Instead of focusing on how we restrict access to information that could allow someone to discriminate, perhaps we could focus on educating our employees on how to use this new medium and why we shouldn't discriminate against anyone in the first place. {* Z4 @1 d6 _
7 G g* W3 R2 C; z* S, }$ I1 O0 t8 b
Here to Stay
5 P9 o6 }: R* I, r: m$ RThe digital world we live in is like the Wild West: hard to live in at times and even harder to regulate. With social networks, personal blogs, and now video resumes, we're reaching a level of transparency that a lot of people may be uncomfortable with.- q( V9 \+ ?! Q! E( Q6 Q; g
! N: k: n7 s/ V8 ?But all of these phenomena are here to stay. It's how we use them that will make a real difference on whether they positively or negatively impact the recruiting industry.